Posts
Hello world!
1 year ago
Saturday, March 21, 2009
Monday, March 16, 2009
taj.or taz..8th wonder .....
The True Story of the Taj Mahal
The story of the Taj Mahal that most of us have known about may not be the real truth. Herein Mr. P. N. Oak presents an interesting set of proofs that show a completely different story. Contrary to what visitors are made to believe the Tajmahal is not a Islamic mausoleum but an ancient Shiva Temple known as Tejo Mahalaya which the 5th generation Moghul emperor Shahjahan commandeered from the then Maharaja of Jaipur. The Taj Mahal, should therefore, be viewed as a temple palace and not as a tomb. That makes a vast difference. You miss the details of its size, grandeur, majesty and beauty when you take it to be a mere tomb. When told that you are visiting a temple palace you wont fail to notice its annexes, ruined defensive walls, hillocks, moats, cascades, fountains, majestic garden, hundreds of rooms archaded verendahs, terraces, multi stored towers, secret sealed chambers, guest rooms, stables, the trident (Trishul) pinnacle on the dome and the sacred, esoteric Hindu letter "OM" carved on the exterior of the wall of the sanctum sanctorum now occupied by the cenotaphs. For detailed proof of this breath taking discovery, you may read the well known historian Shri. P. N. Oak's celebrated book titled " Tajmahal : The True Story". But let us place before you, for the time being an exhaustive summary of the massive evidence ranging over hundred points:
NAME
1.The term Tajmahal itself never occurs in any mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb's time. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.
2.The ending "Mahal"is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as "Mahal".
3.The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects viz., firstly her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani and secondly one cannot omit the first three letters "Mum" from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name of the building.
4.Since the lady's name was Mumtaz (ending with 'Z') the name of the building derived from her should have been Taz Mahal, if at all, and not Taj (spelled with a 'J').
5.Several European visitors of Shahjahan's time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Contrarily Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave.
6.The tomb should be understood to signify NOT A BUILDING but only the grave or centotaph inside it. This would help people to realize that all dead muslim courtiers and royalty including Humayun, Akbar, Mumtaz, Etmad-ud-Daula and Safdarjang have been buried in capture Hindu mansions and temples.
7.Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term Mahal, i.e., mansion apply to it?
8.Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mogul courts it is absurd to search for any mogul explanation for it. Both its components namely, 'Taj' and' Mahal' are of Sanskrit origin.
TEMPLE TRADITION
9.The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the sanskrit term TejoMahalay signifying a Shiva Temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e., The Lord of Agra was consecrated in it.
10.The tradition of removing the shoes before climbing the marble platform originates from pre Shahjahan times when the Taj was a Shiva Temple. Had the Taj originated as a tomb, shoes need not have to be removed because shoes are a necessity in a cemetery.
The story of the Taj Mahal that most of us have known about may not be the real truth. Herein Mr. P. N. Oak presents an interesting set of proofs that show a completely different story. Contrary to what visitors are made to believe the Tajmahal is not a Islamic mausoleum but an ancient Shiva Temple known as Tejo Mahalaya which the 5th generation Moghul emperor Shahjahan commandeered from the then Maharaja of Jaipur. The Taj Mahal, should therefore, be viewed as a temple palace and not as a tomb. That makes a vast difference. You miss the details of its size, grandeur, majesty and beauty when you take it to be a mere tomb. When told that you are visiting a temple palace you wont fail to notice its annexes, ruined defensive walls, hillocks, moats, cascades, fountains, majestic garden, hundreds of rooms archaded verendahs, terraces, multi stored towers, secret sealed chambers, guest rooms, stables, the trident (Trishul) pinnacle on the dome and the sacred, esoteric Hindu letter "OM" carved on the exterior of the wall of the sanctum sanctorum now occupied by the cenotaphs. For detailed proof of this breath taking discovery, you may read the well known historian Shri. P. N. Oak's celebrated book titled " Tajmahal : The True Story". But let us place before you, for the time being an exhaustive summary of the massive evidence ranging over hundred points:
NAME
1.The term Tajmahal itself never occurs in any mogul court paper or chronicle even in Aurangzeb's time. The attempt to explain it away as Taj-i-mahal is therefore, ridiculous.
2.The ending "Mahal"is never muslim because in none of the muslim countries around the world from Afghanistan to Algeria is there a building known as "Mahal".
3.The unusual explanation of the term Tajmahal derives from Mumtaz Mahal, who is buried in it, is illogical in at least two respects viz., firstly her name was never Mumtaj Mahal but Mumtaz-ul-Zamani and secondly one cannot omit the first three letters "Mum" from a woman's name to derive the remainder as the name of the building.
4.Since the lady's name was Mumtaz (ending with 'Z') the name of the building derived from her should have been Taz Mahal, if at all, and not Taj (spelled with a 'J').
5.Several European visitors of Shahjahan's time allude to the building as Taj-e-Mahal is almost the correct tradition, age old Sanskrit name Tej-o-Mahalaya, signifying a Shiva temple. Contrarily Shahjahan and Aurangzeb scrupulously avoid using the Sanskrit term and call it just a holy grave.
6.The tomb should be understood to signify NOT A BUILDING but only the grave or centotaph inside it. This would help people to realize that all dead muslim courtiers and royalty including Humayun, Akbar, Mumtaz, Etmad-ud-Daula and Safdarjang have been buried in capture Hindu mansions and temples.
7.Moreover, if the Taj is believed to be a burial place, how can the term Mahal, i.e., mansion apply to it?
8.Since the term Taj Mahal does not occur in mogul courts it is absurd to search for any mogul explanation for it. Both its components namely, 'Taj' and' Mahal' are of Sanskrit origin.
TEMPLE TRADITION
9.The term Taj Mahal is a corrupt form of the sanskrit term TejoMahalay signifying a Shiva Temple. Agreshwar Mahadev i.e., The Lord of Agra was consecrated in it.
10.The tradition of removing the shoes before climbing the marble platform originates from pre Shahjahan times when the Taj was a Shiva Temple. Had the Taj originated as a tomb, shoes need not have to be removed because shoes are a necessity in a cemetery.
To see pics..click here
luv
kapil
jgd
Thursday, March 12, 2009
krishna meets duryodhana
very nice poem written by ramdhari singh dinkar :
(its in hindi )
http://www.geeta-kavita.com/hindi_sahitya.asp?id=152
luv
kapil
(its in hindi )
http://www.geeta-kavita.com/hindi_sahitya.asp?id=152
luv
kapil
Saturday, February 28, 2009
having very excellent time in delhi. Staying at Nikhil's ho-ohm. his family is very sweet.
saw the movie delhi-6 . i did not like.
day started with a talk in a college named "Lakshmibai college".wahan pe lakshmi bai bhi apne desh pe talk dene aaayegi uska enthu bhi chala jayega. then we went to shri ram college of commerce (shri lakshmi to ram bhai ). most students are least interested in doing any thing other than sitting and feeling that they are preoccupied ( with nothing ).
then we went in the group of 20 to the most happening place in delhi i.e. cannaught place (rajiv chowk) to do the campaighning for THe mArCh and selling t-Shirt , we met with different reactions some were very enthu some were least bothered because of " chalta hai " Attitude which is the main problem in our country and which encourages corruption and terrorism because while reading news of bomb blast people never believe that they can also loose something.
this march is all about making people aware of this chalta hai attitude and making them realising that this they cannot continue because if u are not part of the solution then you are part of the problem ( or you are the problem )and then have extra burden of doing your part also.
"There should be a system and discipline then only we can achieve success".
luv
kapil
saw the movie delhi-6 . i did not like.
day started with a talk in a college named "Lakshmibai college".wahan pe lakshmi bai bhi apne desh pe talk dene aaayegi uska enthu bhi chala jayega. then we went to shri ram college of commerce (shri lakshmi to ram bhai ). most students are least interested in doing any thing other than sitting and feeling that they are preoccupied ( with nothing ).
then we went in the group of 20 to the most happening place in delhi i.e. cannaught place (rajiv chowk) to do the campaighning for THe mArCh and selling t-Shirt , we met with different reactions some were very enthu some were least bothered because of " chalta hai " Attitude which is the main problem in our country and which encourages corruption and terrorism because while reading news of bomb blast people never believe that they can also loose something.
this march is all about making people aware of this chalta hai attitude and making them realising that this they cannot continue because if u are not part of the solution then you are part of the problem ( or you are the problem )and then have extra burden of doing your part also.
"There should be a system and discipline then only we can achieve success".
luv
kapil
Sunday, February 15, 2009
ramayan in one sentence...
yesterday night at 1 o'clock we were sitting and thinking of some one liners for the posters and hoarding for THE MARCH and some of them were catchy. As usually we cannot work without talking about Guruji.
Guruji once in satsang said this...
"Sita is like mind and because of attachment is captured by Ravana(EGO)....and Ravana takes mind away from the CHETANA(as Guruji said) or SELF which is Ram.....and with awareness (LAKSHMAN) and with the help of the Breath (Pavan Putra Hanuman) we can bring Sita back to the Chetana (Ram)."
All our scriptures and mantras are like code and we should have a Guru to decode that .....we will not find these things anywhere else.
please do comment....
luv
kapil
jgd
Guruji once in satsang said this...
"Sita is like mind and because of attachment is captured by Ravana(EGO)....and Ravana takes mind away from the CHETANA(as Guruji said) or SELF which is Ram.....and with awareness (LAKSHMAN) and with the help of the Breath (Pavan Putra Hanuman) we can bring Sita back to the Chetana (Ram)."
All our scriptures and mantras are like code and we should have a Guru to decode that .....we will not find these things anywhere else.
please do comment....
luv
kapil
jgd
Friday, February 13, 2009
Sunday, February 8, 2009
laziness..........
As usually we (ram,saleelda & me ), inspite of several threats from Bau, are getting up late in the morning and yesterday we got up at 10:30 in the morning. i started reading Yoga Vasistha and it goes like this .....
" Self-effort which is not in accord with the scriptures is motivated by delusion. The lazy man is worse than a donkey. One should never yield to laziness but strive to attain liberation, seeing that life is ebbing away every moment. One should not revel in the filth known as sense-pleasures as a worm revels in pus....
after reading the second sentence me and saleelda looked at each other and started laughing loudly....as we got up late....
cont.........
One who says: " Fate is directing me to do this" is brainless, and the goddess of fortune abandons him. Hence, by self-effort acquire wisdom and then realise that this self-effort is not without its own end, in the direct realisation of the truth. If this dreadful source of evil named laziness is not found on earth, who will ever be illiterate and poor? It is because laziness if found on earth that people live the life of animal, miserable and poverty-strcken.
in b/w Rashmin bhaiya's call came and we asked him " what is difference between Delusion and Illusion ?"
first he said it is same ,we said NO.
then he said difference is ILLUSION.
i will write more posts...please do comment..
luv
kapil
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
